Intel Core i7 Processor i7-2700K 3.5GHz 8MB LGA1155 CPU, Retail
$ 294.01
[wpramareviews asin=”B005X64OA8″]
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80623I72700K
Related Posts
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Take basic computing to new levels with the Intel Celeron processor dual-core. Because many software […]
AMD A8-5600K APU 3.6Ghz Processor AD560KWOHJBOX
AMD Processor $ 85.00 [wpramareviews asin=”B0095VPAVE”]
Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.0 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1150 – BX80646I54430
Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80646I54430 $ 188.59 [wpramareviews asin=”B00CO8T9VC”]
3 thoughts on “Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80623I72700K”
Comments are closed.
Extreme performance for the enthusiast.,
This CPU provides exceptional performance in overclocking and stability. Easily OC’s to 4.9 GHZ on merely 1.42 volts, using 16GB of ram with a thermalright silver arrow fan. This CPU has the horsepower to push dual crossfire 6990’s. No BSOD’s of any kind have been experienced, even after Prime 95 torture tests. Highly recommended.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Upgrade from i5-2500K,
If you are going for a gaming processor then go with the i5 of either Sandy Bridge or the new Ivy Bridge. This processor did not increase my gaming performance but it did increase overall computer performance. For the money I think you should get the i5 and save that $100 to spend on an SSD or a better graphics card because a graphics card will make a HUGE difference for $100 than a processor. However, if you are going to use your computer for Compressing, video encoding, audio encoding, video editing, or anything else that is VERY CPU INTENSIVE, then this processor will handle it perfectly.
Was this review helpful to you?
|2700K overclocked to 4.9 Ghz with relatively little water cooling, runs very very fast,
I purchased a 2700K and use it as the meat layer in my latest computer sandwich, between some Asus P8Z68-V/GEN3 and an Antec Kuehler 620 (the cooling portion connected to 2 stacked fans similar to the H80 setup) in an Antec 302 case with a few SilenX 120mm fans at different places in the case. Since the cooling is very silent and effective, I was able to overclock my 2700K to 4.9GHz with a reasonable 1.435v speed/voltage trade-off and very little noise produced by the fans. (One could probably push this one to 5.1 GHz with brute voltage force but it wasn’t worth the trade-off for me).
The results are impressive. In the past, when running 18MPixel CR2 (RAW) to JPEG conversion on the notoriously slow but good DxO Optics Pro 7, I used to get 1 frame per minute throughput on an otherwise fast Intel Core2Duo laptop before (and one frame every 10-15 seconds with Lightroom 3). Now, with the 2700K and making use of its 8-thread hyper-thereaded architecture, I am getting one DxO-converted frame every 6 seconds (and one lightroom frame every 1-2 seconds) :-)! So this CPU, when confronted with the elements and pushed a bit, can deliver stunning performance.
Therefore I find this CPU (and the other i7’s) a great match for computers built for photo and video editing, as the hyperthreading architecture really shows its best in such environments. 5 Stars.
If I had built the rig for gaming, I’d probably pick an i5 instead and put the extra money into the GPU, since most games are running single-threaded for the heavy part.
Of course, I had to push the setup even further by adding an AsusTek HD 6850 GPU to the mix (some of the best computing power values it seems, especially if you build a low-noise setup). Now even DxO, making use of OpenCL and utilizing both CPU and GPU, spits out one frame every 2.5-3 seconds 🙂
Btw, for CPU-to-CPU reviews, I also found the passmark site helpful for my pick.
UPDATE after 6 weeks. I since changed the overclocking settings from 4.9 to 4.8 GHz, to avoid occasional crashes with the 1.435VCore I use. Since then (and after re-timing my ill-advertised RAM to 10-10-10-28, see my Komputerbay 2x8GB 9-9-9-24 review), the machine runs-rock solid. 4.9 GHz would apparently need a bit more voltage than 1.435VCore on my sample.
Keeping it at 5 stars.
Was this review helpful to you?
|